As creators and businesses increasingly rely on AI-generated avatars to host content, narrate videos, and anchor online brands, creators and business owners must now navigate whether and how these brand assets can be protected and how proprietary rights can be enforced against third parties using confusingly similar avatars.
This article is the first in a three-part series examining how creators and businesses can protect AI-generated avatars under U.S. trademark law. In Part 1, we focus on when and why an avatar can function as a trademark. Part 2 will address how to actually file a trademark application at the USPTO, and Part 3 will cover enforcement strategies once rights are established.
Today’s AI avatars often serve as:
- The recurring “face” of a YouTube channel
- The recognizable host of TikTok Reels
- A visual signature in thumbnails, banners, and profile images
- A featured design on merchandise and digital products
If an avatar was created using AI, can it still be protected? In many cases, the answer is yes—but not always in the way people expect.
Many creators assume copyright law is the solution. Under current U.S. law, copyright protection generally requires human authorship. Fully AI-generated images may not qualify, and even prompt-based creation can raise ownership questions. As a result, relying on copyright alone may leave an avatar underprotected.
Once viewers associate an avatar with a particular creator or business, that avatar becomes part of the brand’s identity—and brand identity is exactly what trademark law protects. If viewers recognize an avatar as representing a specific creator, channel, or brand, the avatar may function as a trademark—regardless of how it was created.
TikTok has become a powerful branding platform for avatar-based content. Short-form repetition accelerates recognition, and avatars often serve as instant identifiers in a crowded feed. When avatars are tied to sponsorships, affiliate marketing, or TikTok Shop sales, they are no longer just creative assets—they are commercial ones tied to revenue generation.
If your AI-created avatar:
- Appears consistently across platforms
- Represents your voice or persona
- Is tied to monetization or merchandise
…it is already functioning as a brand—and trademark protection may be both available and advisable.
In Part 2 of this series, we explore how to trademark an AI-generated avatar at the USPTO, including common filing strategies, trademark classes, specimen requirements, and important pitfalls hidden in AI platform terms of use.
If you have any questions about protecting an AI generated avatar or other creative assets, reach out to Tracy at Tjong@EvansFox.com.
Tracy Jong is a Senior Attorney at Evans Fox LLP with 30 years of experience focusing her practice in business law, intellectual property and licensing for alcohol and cannabis. Tracy Jong is a member of the New York Bar and is a registered attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. She can be reached at Tjong@EvansFox.com.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
The content has been prepared for informational purposes only; it should not be construed as legal advice, does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship, and readers should not act upon it without seeking professional counsel.